About Me

Name: Thinking
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

What If . . .

 

What if Jesus did NOT die for your sins? You are responsible for all of your own actions. There is no one else to blame or cajole into covering for you. I am not suggesting that Jesus did not live or is or is not the son of God. Just that you are in fact responsible for yourselves.


What if you could do whatever you want assuming that you yourself will have to pay the price? There is no forgiveness for being mean or murderous, idle, sloppy and slothful, and wasteful. There is no forgiveness for being a thief, a liar, a drunkard, a junkie, a dealer. You will have to pay the piper.


What if no one has your back? They will run if you have serious problems. The government (meaning people supported by taxes paid by the working people around you) will not cover your debt and your cost of living for beyond a few years while you get training and get a job. Taxpayers will not give you and your family welfare for five generations.


What if you have to think for yourself, be responsible for yourself, and be responsible for anything you create, whether it is good or bad? You will have to raise your own children and fund them. There is no funding from the government or any church in any meaningful way. You are on your own.


As I write this, I know there are groups of people who are going to be upset and say “You don’t know how we’ve suffered.” There will be people who insist that I don’t know what it’s like because of my color, my race, my sex, as though these comments were derivative of anything other than truth.


What if I suggest to you that if you think someone is a bigot or racist just because they are white or male or female or anything means that YOU are a bigot or racist?


Sorry, if you are the third or fourth or fifth generation of your family still on welfare, you have only learned to rely on others to care for you. You are not contributing to the betterment of anything. If you have children, you are bringing them up as second-class citizens. Why would you want to do that? I don’t care what your excuse is. Unless you have generations of physically disabled people in your family, which seems highly unlikely, you’ve learned to be lazy and useless.


You listen to lies to make your life work: Have babies. God will support you. That’s the church wanting you to have more babies so they have a larger economic base. The more church-going people, the more money the church will have.


You listen to lies to justify your generations of anger.


Grow up. America is among the world’s remarkable countries. It has been and is being built by the hard work of generations of immigrants. There are many opportunities for everyone. Look at the people who fight to come here illegally to find work to make a living for their families. I don’t agree with illegal entry as it automatically makes that person a criminal, whether or not they feel that way, but wanting to find work to survive is noble. I also have problems with those who come here to have their babies ‘cause that automatically makes the babies Americans and eligible for welfare and our population is growing so quickly that this will destroy the things we all came her for in the first place.


During a conference in San Francisco, a grandmother who was taking care of her grandchildren was being complimented for her “dedication to family.” She had been and still was on welfare. While accepting the accolades being bestowed on her, with tears in her eyes she talked about how difficult it was and how “the system” ruined the lives of her own children, all of whom were on drugs or in jail, and how she “had” to raise her grandchildren because of “the system” that ruined the lives of her children.


This is ludicrous. Children of welfare parents have to be embarrassed by their conditions and it is their parents – not “the system” – that helped get them into ongoing welfare. Children are naturally conservative and welfare is out of bounds. Welfare for those who do not deserve it as a temporary measure is living a lie.


Upon his 18th birthday, one of my daughter’s friends said that his grandmother told him to “go sign up for welfare.” Not “Get a job.” Not “Are you going to college?” Not “What are you going to do now that you are out of school?” But, “Go sign up for welfare.” That’s disgusting. There was no reason on earth for that young man to go on welfare. He was intelligent, tall, handsome, and fully capable of taking care of himself.

Maybe the grandmother who said “the system” ruined the lives of her children was correct. If the system stopped the welfare, she would have been responsible for herself and their welfare. There wouldn’t be anyone else to blame.

The crippling effect of welfare was made manifest during the horrendous tidal wave that hit Louisiana. The world watched as thousands of people left town and others stayed waiting for help to come. When no help came, the people who had been used to being taken care of their whole lives by the system had to figure out what to do. And they brilliantly did so. Several days into the inundation, the world watched as two mothers found plastic, watertight crab containers, put their children in those containers and waded through waist-high water to get their families to safety.

This was probably viewed as a matter of course by most, but my view was that people rose to the occasion to help themselves only when there was no other way but to help themselves. And they can help themselves.


What if, for the first child you have for which you seek welfare, you are paid, say, $800 a month – which is the going rate in California – and for every child after that, the money you get decreases say to $400, then $200, then you have to be sterilized if you are still on welfare in order to receive any more money at all AND you have to get to work within one year? The system needs changing.

To be continued . . .

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Speak English, Please

 

Join me in ceasing all business transactions with any company that has messages in English and Spanish while ignoring all other communities, communities which have contributed and continue to contribute mightily to the welfare of this country. What corporations are doing is just plain wrong. It's either English only -- which is what it should be -- or it's all languages.

Linda Chavez (Friday, June 22, 2007, Townhall.com), goes after California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger (and a couple of other politicians) for pandering to constituents by speaking Spanish during election time and asks that they “Speak English, Please.”


She states that “Spanish-speaking newcomers are going through today in their transition to English” as nearly identical to what every group encountered at periods of high immigration over the last 200 years. She writes that 100 years earlier, there were German-language newspapers, German-language theater, German civic associations, and German bilingual schools. “Even today, nearly 1.4 million Americans still speak German at home; it is the fourth most popular foreign language spoken in the U.S. after Spanish, Chinese and French.”


And she questions “will Hispanic immigrants learn English over time, as the Germans, Italians, Poles and others did before them? “The evidence, based on studies of Hispanic immigrants' children and grandchildren, suggests they will. But it might help if policymakers like Schwarzenegger didn't speak out of both sides of their mouth on this issue.”


With all due respect, Ms. Chavez’s article is somewhat short-sighted. Not only were there newspapers in other languages, including German, French, Chinese, etc., there still are, but what did not exist is every major corporation in America setting up to cater to two languages.


All other nationalities HAD to learn English as they were not pandered to. Does Ms. Chavez not believe that Spanish-speaking people would learn English faster if they had too?


I live in an area with a large Spanish population (many of whom are here illegally) and I hear English less frequently by the day. I was recently in a well-known, quite large department store and did not hear one person speaking English -- not the clerks and not the customers!


I’m becoming increasingly baffled at the insistence of our South-of-the-U.S.-border-neighbors in speaking Spanish once they arrive on U.S. soil and at the pandering to that predilection by American corporations (although I realize that is based in greed).


It seems to me that unless you were born in Spain, the Spanish language is that of one's captors. It is the language of the people that sailed in to destroy Mexican, Central and South American cities and cultures, took their land, stole their gold (and sent it to Spain), raped their women, and insisted that they become Catholic and pro-create even when there wasn't/isn't sufficient water and food.

It also seems to me that people coming to America are seeking a better life, opportunity, sometimes escaping war and strife, etc., and have been more than willing to learn English, which, for better or worse, is the language of this country. I understand the difficulties of learning another language – my attempts at various languages are pitiful, but I do attempt to speak the language of any country I’m in. If you feel somehow that Spanish is a superior language, then stay in or move to a Spanish-speaking country.


Shouldn't American corporations either have to cater to all languages, or only to English? Catering to English and Spanish only fosters prejudice doesn’t it?


A young Mexican-American writer named Dacia Medina was born in America. Her father came to the U.S. illegally from Mexico 32 years ago and married an American. Ms. Medina attended U.S. schools, predominantly Spanish, yet Ms. Medina does not speak Spanish and, ironically, was turned down because she does not speak the language fluently. On July 29, 2007, she wrote on AmericanContent.com, “This has not been the first time this has happened. This is frightening. What is the problem here when an American born and raised in this country can not get a job because they do not speak a foreign language? Isn’t this America? Isn't our primary language English?”


We are all in a position to make a difference, particularly people with Hispanic surnames. I know third and fourth generation Americans originally from South of the Border who speak fluent English, some speak Spanish, and most are embarrassed by illegal immigrants and being lumped in with a group that chooses to fly under the radar.

Ms Chavez’s finger-pointing at Schwarzenegger's inclination to speak Spanish during election time is pointing in a convenient direction, but won't solve anything. What about pointing to all the greedy companies who are the people creating a dual language nation?

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »